Bugs found in HacknPlan SaaS

HacknPlan

HacknPlan is a visually striking platform that offers a space for game developers to manage their ideas and processes, helping them realize their creative genius.

With diverse functionalities, such as Kanban boards and integrated game design documentation, HacknPlan provides developers with a robust tool to create exciting narratives.

Recently, our team at QAwerk has carried out a comprehensive bug crawl of this platform. We discovered several bugs that could potentially affect both performance and user experience.

Possible to enter only one first name

Severity:

Major

Precondition:

The website is open.

Steps to Reproduce:
  1. Click the “Try now” button.
  2. Enter first name.
  3. Enter an email.
  4. Enter the password.
  5. Mark the checkbox.
  6. Click “Sign up”.
Environment:

OS: Windows 10 Chrome version 140, Firefox 142.0.1, Edge 140.0.3485.66

Actual Result:

An error occurs, and the user is not registered.

Expected Result:

The user is registered.

Possible to enter only one first name

Possible to enter non-valid email

Severity:

Major

Precondition:

The website is open.

Steps to Reproduce:
  1. Click the “Try now” button.
  2. Enter first name.
  3. Enter an email without .com.
Environment:

OS: Windows 10 Chrome version 140, Firefox 142.0.1, Edge 140.0.3485.66

Actual Result:

The system shows that the email is valid.

Expected Result:

The system shows that the email is invalid.

Possible to enter non-valid email

Several errors occur in console during user setup

Severity:

Major

Precondition:

The website is open.

Steps to Reproduce:
  1. Register in the system.
  2. Open the console.
  3. Set up your user.
Environment:

OS: Windows 10 Chrome version 140, Firefox 142.0.1, Edge 140.0.3485.66

Actual Result:

A bunch of errors occur in the console.

Expected Result:

No errors in the console.

Several errors occur in console during user setup
I performed manual exploratory and regression testing of HacknPlan’s core flows (project/task creation, task lifecycle, user roles, and integrations). The overall platform behavior is stable and user-friendly. I can only recommend adding some automated end-to-end tests to facilitate integrations and cross-browser compatibility.
Oleksii, QA engineer

Oleksii, QA engineer

Need a reliable QA partner?

Hire us